Discrepancies between OSgL schema and C++ implementation in OSDataStructures
|Reported by:||Gassmann||Owned by:||somebody|
|Keywords:||OSgL schema, implementation, constitution||Cc:||JunMa, kmartin|
Description (last modified by kmartin)
SparseVector? in OSDataStructures has
For consistence with OSgL it should be
Kipp Comment -- I think it would be a mistake to have to define an object for each element in an array. For example,
seems far more cumbersome than
Having a constructor and destructor called for each nonzero could take a lot time for large problems.
There is also a discrepancy between the implementation of the int and double vectors in C++ and in the OSgL schema.